Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Telethon Thoughts

Picture of a donation can with a dollar bill and some coins lying near it.
The Disability Visibility Project blog ran a great series over the last few days about Jerry Lewis’ Muscular Dystrophy Telethon, with articles by disability activists reflecting on their strong and sometimes personal feelings about the telethon and using pity to raise money for disability causes. Each one is well worth reading and exploring further:

Disability Visibility Project - August 29, 2014

Disability Visibility Project - August 30, 2014

Disability Visibility Project - August 31, 2014

Disability Visibility Project - September 1, 2014

Protests against the MDA Telethon started right around the time I woke up to the disability rights movement, and it was one of the first demonstrations I remember of the fact that disability rights is not an easy, simple road. It involves a lot of “biting the hand that feeds you”, and many aspects of disability rights thinking do not come naturally. It’s one thing to observe that disabled people deserve equal rights … that’s something everyone should know instinctively. Unless you have a disability yourself, you have to think actively and practice deliberate empathy to understand how a well-intended fundraiser can be not only distasteful, but even harmful. On the other hand, once you do see it, especially if you have a disability, it’s impossible thereafter not to see it.

I had a conversation this weekend about the Ice Bucket Challenge, and afterwards I realized another thing that bothers me about so many disability fundraising efforts.

I don’t really object to raising money for medical research into disabling conditions. I resent the fact that the general public is consistently more excited about supporting those efforts than they ever are about supporting equal rights, equal access, and the nuts-and-bolts stuff disabled people need to live decent lives with our disabilities. It’s strange, when you think about it. “Medical Research” is so abstract, and outcomes so fleeting, while building ramps and buying people speech synthesizers is entirely concrete, with immediate payoff. You would think all us practical-minded Americans would rather give to pay for things people can use, than to provide open-ended funding for fuzzy dreams. Yet, it’s exactly the opposite.

As one of my favorite bloggers often says, “People Is Weird”.

(P.S.: ... says the guy with a PayPal donation button on his blog!)

Monday, September 1, 2014

This

"Old Pain I’m used to: the tightness in my hips when I don’t stretch in the morning, the pressure where my legs meet my back when I walk too far. It’s not that I don’t feel it; it’s just been there for so long that I know not to get nervous about it anymore. New Pain is where it gets scary because it stops having a name. I can’t immediately catalog it or diagnose it as benign. At best, disability allows you to create a tenuous peace with your body, and anytime it decides to violate that mutual agreement can be terrifying. You take the time to figure it out — what it likes and dislikes, where it functions best — and stick to that routine, until New Pain reminds you that you’re never quite going to have this figured out.” — Know Me Where It Hurts: Sex, Kink, and Cerebral Palsy
It's only part of a longer, quite excellent piece by a woman with Cerebral Palsy, but I related to this bit so strongly that I just had to take note of it.

This.

Very much this.

Via the Disability Fashion Project Tumblr blog.

Buy It: "The West Wing"

"The West Wing” series is about so many things that its extended depictions of disability take their natural place as just one of many interlocking story lines. President Josiah Bartlett’s “hidden” Multiple Sclerosis echoes the real President Roosevelt’s imperfectly obscured Polio. Although the later years of the show aren’t as good as the first few, the disability depiction improves, showing the President’s progressing disability both as a legitimate personal crisis, and a manageable one that only occasionally interferes with his conduct of “the job”.

It’s such a bonus to that we get another disability depiction, in the recurring character Joey Lucas, the political pollster who is deaf, played by Marlee Matlin. Her introductory scene, in which a drunk Josh Lyman struggles to understand that she is deaf, and the guy with her is her Sign Language Interpreter, is one of the funniest scenes in the entire series.

Two Views Of Autism

Ideas topic icon
Julia Belluz, Vox.com - August 28, 2014
"What's more, autism spectrum disorders — which causes social impairment and stifles people's ability to communicate — still represents significant suffering globally. 'The burden of disease caused by the disorders is not only high in children but continues throughout the lifespan into adulthood,' says Baxter. In 2010, autism spectrum disorders caused 7.7 million person-years of healthy life lost, around the world."
Two of Vox.com's strengths are explaining things, and dampening hysteria with actual information. I am glad to see them take on the supposed explosive growth of autism. I would love even more for Vox.com do a followup addressing the radically different conceptions of autism that most autistic people, and those of us who read and write disability blogs know about, but most people don’t.

“Suffering” and “healthy life lost” provide an unusually clear picture of the divide between two fundamentally different ways of understanding autism.

The traditional, medical view is that autistic people "suffer from” autism. And because autism apparently means autistic people have no personalities or points of view of their own, families suffer even more, from the stress and anguish of having kids with autism. If they really thought about it, most people would probably say that “autistic” and “healthy” are incompatible concepts, and that autism is one of the most dread of diseases, the very opposite of, "I don't care if it's a boy or a girl. I just want it to be healthy!"

The Neurodiversity or Autism Acceptance views of autism do not deny that autism exists or that it is difficult. Nor do they deny that there is suffering. The difference is where the suffering is thought to come from. In this alternative view, autism is not always inherently painful or debilitating. Rather, it is non-autistic people's lack of understanding of autism and, their pathologizing approaches to it, that cause autistic people to suffer most.

I wonder if and when these different paradigms of autism … and of other disabilities, too … will become more widely known. It seems like an important thing to at least be aware of.

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Disabled TV Character Face-Off - Survey

Photos of disabled TV characters: Robert Ironside, Addie Langdon, Artie Abrams, Jewel, Joey Lucas, Capt. Pike, Tyrion Lannister, Dr. Kerry Weaver, Corky Sherwood
Following up on yesterday’s post, here’s your chance to help start the Disabled Character Face-Off. The top 16 of these 32 characters will compete in a “bracket” style elimination tournament, to determine the best disabled TV character of all time!


Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey , the world's leading questionnaire tool.

Weekly Wrap-Up

Disability Thinking Weekly Wrap Up in white letters superimposed over sepia-tone photo of handicapped parking spaces

Characters, questions, and ice buckets.

Sunday, August 24, 2014
Monday, August 25, 2014
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Friday, August 29, 2014
Saturday, August 30, 2014

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Video Of The Day


So many amputees make it look easy, so it’s good to be reminded that there are still very real, practical impairments involved.

Disabled TV Character Face-Off

Photo of an old-style TV set with the wheelchair symbol on the screen
As I promised in yesterday's Disability.TV podcast, here is an initial list of competitors for the esteemed title of "Best Disabled TV Character Of All Time". It's just a draft list though. Before creating the definitive bracket and getting on with the individual face-offs, I'd like to get a few ideas from you. Who are your favorite TV characters with disabilities? Who is missing from this list? Are there any on the list that don't belong on it?

I don't have any firm rules for what kinds of characters should be in this competition. However, I would tentatively suggest that we not count one-time guest characters, TV movies characters, or truly background characters without dialog or involvement in a show's ongoing plot. Minor characters are fine, as are recurring characters who appear on a TV show more than one or two times. The character must have either a known disability, or one that is obvious to us the viewers, even if it is not acknowledged by the other characters on the show.

So here is the draft list, in alphabetical order:

Addie Langdon - American Horror Story
Artie Abrams - Glee
Becky Jackson - Glee
Bran Stark - Game Of Thrones
Chief Robert Ironside - Ironside
Claudius - I, Claudius
Corky Sherwood - Life Goes On
Daniel "Lifeguard" Borroughs - Wiseguy
Derek - Derek
Detective Robert Ironside - Ironside
Dr. Kerry Weaver - ER
Dr. Gregory House - House, M.D.
Hodor - Game Of Thrones
Jaime Lannister - Game Of Thrones
Jake Malinak - Becker
Jason Street - Friday Night Lights
Jewel - Deadwood
Jimmy - South Park
John Bates - Downton Abbey
Joey Lucas - The West Wing
Kevin Girardi - Joan Of Arcadia
Maester Aemon - Game Of Thrones
Max Braverman - Parenthood
Mel Fisher - Growing Up Fisher
President Josiah Bartlett - The West Wing
Sheldon Cooper - The Big Bang Theory
Sherlock Holmes - Sherlock
Timmy - South Park
Tyrion Lannister - Game Of Thrones
Walter "Flynn" White, Jr. - Breaking Bad

Send your changes and additions to my email address: apulrang@icloud.com.

Friday, August 29, 2014

Disability.TV Podcast - Supplemental

In this brief podcast, I talk about some adjustments to my approach, ask listeners for feedback, and preview what's to come in upcoming episodes.



Podcast Schedule

September 5
Ironside (New)

September 12
Guest Co-Host Maddy Ruvolo

September 19
Game Of Thrones - Tyrion Lannister
Guest Co-Host Alice Wong

September 26
Mini-Cast

October 3
Game Of Thrones - Jaimie Lannister, Bran Stark, and Others
Guest Co-Host Alice Wong

October 10
Mini-Cast

October 17
Guest Co-Host Cheryl Green

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Question For Discussion

Stick figure carrying a question mark
I have a question inspired by a Twitter exchange I just saw involving @ollibean, @emily_ladau, @autselfadvocacy, and @AndyAUCD, about how a family can find help for a college student with disabilities who needs personal care assistance while at college.

Question:

Why is it so common for disabled people and their families to wish for programs and support services that already, basically, exist?

Are the programs too opaque and difficult to find? Are they under-funded? Are disabled people and their families not looking in the right places or asking the right questions? Do existing supports target the wrong problems and the wrong populations? Is it just poor PR and marketing skills? Are peoples’ expectations too high, so they don’t go for services that aren’t 100% perfect?

What do you think? Leave your thoughts in Comments.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

More Important, Not Less

Advocacy
Center for Medicare Advocacy

Medicare plans to stop approving purchase of speech devices … electronic machines that generate speech for people who can’t speak due to a disability … for people in health care facilities like nursing homes. Picture Stephen Hawking with his voice synthesizer.

The rationale, it seems, is that such facilities provide total care, so it’s less important for the patient to be able to communicate.

The same rationale use to be used … may still for all I know … to refuse purchase of electric wheelchairs and mobility scooters for people in nursing homes and other institutions. Someone in such a facility doesn’t need to be mobile in an institutional setting, because the institution does everything for them.

In both cases, this is a twisted rationale only a penny-pinching bureaucrat could come up with. I’m not knocking penny-pinching bureaucrats. It’s not horrible for someone to ASK whether these devices are still necessary for people in medical facilities. The problem is that other people with some knowledge of health care and disability (including disability rights) should answer that yes, they are necessary. In fact, they may be more necessary since even the “best” institutions tend to curtail patient mobility and healthy activity, and communication is the patient’s best protection from neglect, abuse, or medical error.

Let me say it again … it’s fine to question what some might see as “sacred cows”. But the accountants need to sit down and shut up when the items they want to skimp on are found to be, in fact, vital.

Click the link above to write to your Members of Congress.

When "Despite" Is Really "Because"

Harold Braswell, Washington Post - August 25, 2014

This is a good article on a timely and important topic. I would only add one thing.

I can't prove it, but I suspect that many police and a great many ordinary citizens think that mental illness is actually a justification for deadly force, not a reason to avoid it. It might not always be a conscious belief, but I think a lot of people still associate mental illness (a.k.a. "crazy") with unpredictability and violence. We say, "He shot the man, even though he was mentally ill", while on some level, it's really, "He shot the man because he was mentally ill, and therefore scary and threatening."

Unless this powerful prejudice is directly confronted and refuted with ironclad information and alternative strategies, this kind of thing is going to continue to happen to mentally ill people. I have somewhat higher hopes for change in how police deal with intellectually disabled people, like Ethan Saylor.

There's plenty of stigma to go round, but I think mentally ill people get the worst of it.

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Photo Of The Day

black and white photo of the inside of a museum with several children in wheelchairs
Students with disabilities visiting the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, 1922.